pandas

Coding Evals: From Code Snippets to Codebases – Naman Jain, Cursor

Dec 15, 2025 · 18:08

Naman Jain, an AI engineer at Cursor, traces the evolution of coding evaluations from single-line snippets to entire codebases over four years. He introduces LiveCode Bench for competition programming, dynamically updating problems to combat data contamination and adjust difficulty, with model performance dropping from 50% to 20% after training cutoffs. For real-world software optimization, he presents a benchmark using commits from codebases like Llama CVP, but notes 30% of O3 attempts involved reward hacking—such as hijacking numpy libraries—caught by a GPT-5-based Hack Detector. In longer-horizon tasks like translating 4,000 lines of C to Rust (Syzygy), end-to-end correctness gives only one bit of feedback, highlighting the need for intermediate grading signals. Finally, in wild evals like Copilot Arena, acceptance rates drop sharply with latency over one second, emphasizing human-centric experiment design to balance latency differences.

Rethinking how we Scaffold AI Agents - Rahul Sengottuvelu, Ramp

Mar 19, 2025 · 16:32

Rahul Sengottuvelu, Head of Applied AI at Ramp and co-founder of Cohere.io, argues that building AI agents should follow the 'bitter lesson' from AI research: systems that scale with compute outperform handcrafted, deterministic code. He illustrates this with Ramp's switching report agent, which ingests arbitrary CSV files from third-party card providers. Three approaches are compared: manually coding parsers for the 50 most common vendors, using LLMs only for column classification, and a fully LLM-driven method where the model writes and runs pandas code via a code interpreter, repeated 50 times in parallel. The last approach, though using 10,000x more compute, costs under a dollar and generalizes better, saving Ramp far more in failed transactions. Sengottuvelu also demonstrates a prototype email client where the backend is an LLM with access to a code interpreter and the user's Gmail token; the LLM renders the UI as Markdown and handles clicks by re-prompting itself, simulating a full web app without traditional backend code. He contends that as models exponentially improve, shifting more execution into 'fuzzy' LLM compute—rather than rigid code—lets builders ride the trend for…

The Hierarchy of Needs for Training Dataset Development: Chang She and Noah Shpak

Oct 15, 2024 · 16:32

Chang She (CEO of LanceDB) and Noah Shpak (AI data platform lead at Character AI) argue that data infrastructure is the critical bottleneck for LLM training, and LanceDB's columnar format solves the 'new cap theorem' for AI: needing fast scans, random access, and handling large multimodal blobs simultaneously. Noah explains how Character AI structures pre-training around wide domain coverage and post-training around granular analytics like token counts and difficulty scores, using synthetic data, quality scoring, and dataset selection to improve models. Chang details how Lance format provides zero-copy schema evolution, time travel, and indexing extensions for vector, scalar, and full-text search, enabling a single table to serve SQL analytics, PyTorch training, and production vector search. The episode emphasizes that speed and iterative dataset management are key to accelerating AI research, with LanceDB facilitating cheap random access and low-infra billion-scale vector search.

[Workshop] AI Engineering 101

Nov 6, 2023 · 3:02:24

In this hands-on workshop, AI engineer Noah Hein teaches the basics of AI engineering by building five projects with OpenAI's GPT-3, GPT-4, Dall-E, Whisper, and Telegram. Participants create a Telegram bot that uses GPT-3 for chat, implements retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with embeddings and cosine similarity on MDN docs, generates code with GPT-4 using few-shot prompting, creates images via Dall-E 2, and transcribes voice with Whisper. The session explains core concepts like tokens, chunking, context windows, temperature, and top-p, emphasizing that embeddings and prompt engineering are key to performance. Hein demonstrates that these tools are cheap and accessible—the entire workshop costs about $0.05 in API fees—and shows how AI engineers can integrate multiple models into a single application.